Cost effectiveness and long term survival of locally made Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts for corneal transplantation in Edmonton
Mon statut pour la session
Authors: Maya Tong, David Ellis, Bonnie Kissick, Khaliq Kurji, Dean Mah, David Climenhaga.
Disclosure Block: M. Tong: None. D. Ellis: None. B. Kissick: None. K. Kurji: Membership on advisory boards or speakers’ bureaus; Name of for-profit or not-for-profit organization(s); Shire Ophthalmics, Labtician Ophthalmics. Membership on advisory boards or speakers’ bureaus; Description of relationship(s); Advisory board member. D. Mah: None. D. Climenhaga: None.
Purpose: In
collaboration with Edmonton’s Comprehensive Tissue Centre (CTC), the purpose of
this project is to create a sustainable, cost effective program where Descemet
membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts can be made and used locally,
instead of purchased from American eye banks.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study
Methods: Two operators were trained to make DMEK grafts. For DMEK grafts
made between October 1, 2018 and October 15, 2020, local donor corneas accepted
as suitable for DMEK underwent slit lamp evaluation at the Comprehensive Tissue
Centre (CTC). When local tissue could not be procured, pre-stripped DMEK grafts
were purchased from American eye banks. Donor characteristics including age,
medical history of diabetes mellitus, and pre- and post-DMEK preparation
endothelial cell density (ECD) were compared using unpaired T-test or
chi-square analysis where appropriate. The cost of each locally made graft was
calculated and compared to the cost that would otherwise have been accrued if
each graft had been bought from an American eye bank.
Results: 125 DMEK surgeries were completed over 24.5 months. 60 (48%) of
these were purchased from an American eye bank. 68 (54%) DMEK grafts were
prepared locally, 3 (2.4%) of which failed the preparation process. There was
no statistically significant difference in average donor age (p = 0.29) or
number of donors with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.39) between the
purchased and home cut DMEK groups. The average endothelial cell density (ECD)
pre-stripping was 2834 cells/mm2 (±178) in the purchased group and
2743 cells/mm2 (±216) in the home cut group. Post-stripping ECD was
2845 cells/mm2 (±230) in the purchased group and 2657 cells/mm2
(±264) in the home cut group. There was no significant endothelial cell loss
between the two groups (p = 0.9). There was no significant difference in graft
failure between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.14) The cost
of making a DMEK graft locally was calculated based on initial purchase of
re-sterilizable instruments ($2864.63 one-time investment), disposable
instruments ($72.58 per graft), and additional transportation costs ($6.50 per
graft). The cost of purchasing 60 DMEK grafts was $240 000. The cost of making
68 DMEK grafts locally was $8242.07. The cost of 125 DMEK grafts was $248
242.07, resulting in a savings of $254 882.93 over 24.5 months.
Conclusions: Training local operators to make high quality DMEK grafts
with local donor corneas is extremely cost effective and an efficient use of
local tissues.