Prospective analysis of retinal vessel printing on fundus autofluorescense following pneumatic retinopexy
Mon statut pour la session
Authors: Carolina Francisconi, Koby Brosh, Verena Juncal, Alan R. Berger, Filiberto Altomare, David R. Chow, David T. Wong, Louis R. Giavedoni, Rajeev H. Muni
Author Disclosure Block: C. Francisconi: None. K.
Brosh: None. V. Juncal: None. A.R. Berger: None. F.
Altomare: None. D.R. Chow: None. D.T. Wong: None. L.R.
Giavedoni: None. R.H. Muni: None.
Abstract Body:
Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that
approximately 30 to 40% of patients that undergo pars plana vitrectomy (PPV)
for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair have post-operative retinal
displacement on Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. Recently, the PIVOT
trial showed that Pneumatic Retinopexy (PnR) may offer advantages over PPV in
terms of visual acuity and vertical distortion. However, the rates of retinal
displacement following pneumatic retinopexy have never been reported. In the
present study, we aim to report the rates of retinal displacement following
PnR.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study.
Methods: The study included patients presenting with primary
macula-off RRD where PnR was the treatment of choice. Patients with previous
retinal surgery or severe media opacity were excluded. The incidence of
retinal displacement was assessed by FAF imaging between 2 and 4 months post
RRD repair. The images were evaluated by 2 independent masked graders for the
presence of retinal vessel printing (RVP).
Results: We evaluated 20 eyes of 20 patients. Fifteen patients were
male, the median age was 59 (range 24-79) and 12 patients were phakic. All
patients had injection of SF6 gas and had steam-roller maneuver. Four patients
required additional gas injection and 5 patients failed PnR treatment and
underwent subsequent PPV. The median follow-up period was 77 days (range 46-133).
Three patients were excluded from analysis as the FAF images could not be
assessed for RVP due to development of media opacity following PPV. Of the
remaining 17 patients, 2 patients (11.8%) had retinal displacement following
pneumatic retinopexy.
Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study 11.8% of patients who
underwent primary pneumatic retinopexy developed subsequent retinal
displacement on FAF imaging. These results suggest that PnR for RRD repair is
associated with far less retinal displacement than that described with PPV
based on the published literature.