Aqueous humor lipidomic profile in glaucoma patients
Mon statut pour la session
Authors: David J. Mathew, Izhar Livne-Bar, Darren Chan, Yvonne M. Buys, Graham E. Trope, Marisa Sit, Becca Flitter, Karsten Gronert, Jeremy M. Sivak.
Author
Disclosure Block: D.J. Mathew: None. I. Livne-Bar: None. D.
Chan: None. Y.M. Buys: None. G.E. Trope: None. M.
Sit: None. B. Flitter: None. K. Gronert: None. J.M.
Sivak: None.
Abstract
Body:
Purpose: To
identify the aqueous humor (AH) lipidomic profile in glaucomatous eyes compared
to those without glaucoma
Study Design: Prospective comparative study
Methods: AH samples from eyes with and without glaucoma underwent
lipidomic analyses using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The
glaucoma samples were obtained from 60-80-year-old primary open angle glaucoma
patients undergoing a glaucoma surgery with or without cataract surgery and the
control samples were obtained from patients undergoing routine cataract
surgery. Patients with diabetes mellitus, systemic inflammatory disease,
uveitis, retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration were excluded. From
each eye, 100 μL of AH was collected using a 30 Gauge needle mounted on a 1-mL
syringe, introduced into the anterior chamber anterior to the limbus, prior to
any surgical intraocular entry. The samples were snap frozen on dry ice and
transported for lipidomic analyses of a panel of 40 polyunsaturated fatty acids
(PUFA), metabolites and lipid mediators. All participating patients signed an
informed consent form and the study was approved by the University Health
Network and Kensington Eye Institute Research and Ethics Boards.
Results: AH was collected from 16 and 18 eyes with and without
glaucoma, respectively. The mean age was 68.7±6.4 years for the glaucoma group
and 71.0±4.7 years for the control group (p=0.25). The mean preoperative
intraocular pressure 14.1±3.1 and 15.2±1.6 mmHg for the glaucoma and control
groups, respectively (p=0.24). The cup-to-disc ratios were 0.9±0.1 and 0.3±0.1
for the glaucoma and control groups, respectively (p<0.001). All 16 glaucoma
eyes received prostaglandin analogue eye drops prior to surgery; 15 were on
beta-blocker eye drops. There were statistically significant differences
between glaucomatous and control eyes for arachidonic acid (1328.0±322.0 vs
643.1±130.6, p=0.001), lipoxin A4 (0.79±0.14 vs 0.32±0.10,
p=0.01) and 12-hydoxyeicosapentanoic acid (0.35±0.17 vs undetected, p=0.04).
Substantial levels, but no significant differences, were identified for
docosahexanoic acid (212.0±46.33 vs 131.1±22.36, p=0.11), eicosapentanoic acid
(6.21±1.40 vs 3.76±0.32, p=0.08), prostaglandin E2 (2.83±1.92
vs undetected, p=0.13) and prostaglandin D2 (2.43±1.49 vs 0,
p=0.09). All other analytes were below detection limits.
Conclusions: Increased levels of lipid mediators are present in
glaucomatous eyes. Arachidonic acid metabolites may be modulated in response to
anti-glaucoma drops and play a role in glaucoma pathogenesis.