Multimodal analysis of hyperautofluoresent ring size in retinitis pigmentosa
My Session Status
Authors: Collier (Shangjun) Jiang, Netan Choudhry
Author Disclosure Block: C. Jiang: None. N.
Choudhry: Consultant; Topcon. Topcon had no role in the study design,
collection, analysis and interpretation of data in this report.
Abstract Body:
Purpose: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of inherited
retinal diseases characterized by progressive degeneration of photoreceptor
cells. The ring of hyperautofluorescence is a well-recognized feature in
retinitis pigmentosa (RP). These areas of increased autofluorescence correspond
to an increase of lipofuscin in the retina pigment epithelium, which indicates
increased metabolic activity and oxidative stress. However, little is known
about the relationship between the area of hyperautofluorescence and vascular
perfusion parameters as obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography
(OCT-A).
Study Design: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we
measured the area of the hyperautofluoresent ring in patients with RP, to
determine correlation with visual acuity, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) size, and
retinal capillary perfusion density (CPD).
Methods: 9 patients with bilateral RP were identified using fundus
autofluorescence (AF) (California; Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland), totaling 18
eyes. Patient medial records were reviewed to obtain demographic and visual
acuity data. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A)
(AngioVue; Optovue, Fremont, CA) was used to assess retinal vascular perfusion
and calculate CPD in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary
plexus (DCP) using both a 3.0 mm x 3.0 mm strategy, and a 6.0 mm x 6.0 mm
strategy. In addition, OCT-A was used to measure and calculate the size of FAZ.
ImageJ software (version 1.51k) was used to measure the area of the
hyperautofluoresent ring in each eye with RP. Pearson correlation coefficients
were calculated to determine the strength of linear relationship between
hyperautofluoresent ring size and the following variables: visual acuity, SCP
parafoveal CPD, DCP parafoveal CPD, and FAZ area. Regression analysis was
performed to determine if the correlation between two measured variables were
statistically significant.
Results: Hyperautofluoresent ring area was highly concordant
between the right and left eyes in each patient (R = 0.99, P < 0.001). While
hyperautofluoresent ring size and FAZ size were inversely correlated, the
results were not significant (R = -0.36, P = 0.14). Visual acuity was not
correlated with hyperautofluoresent ring size (R = 0.24, P = 0.33). There was
no correlation between hyperautofluoresent ring size and parafoveal CPD using
the 3.0 mm x 3.0 mm strategy or 6.0 x 6.0 mm strategy in the SCP (R = 0.08, R =
0.19; respectively), or DCP (R = 0.28, R = 0.27; respectively).
Conclusions: Assessing the hyperautofluoresent ring in RP is an
important clinical tool for determining disease severity and progression.
Previous studies have indicated that RP eyes had a significantly lower SCP and
DCP parafoveal flow density compared to age-matched controls. Additionally,
disease progression in RP has been shown to correlate with constriction in
hyperautofluoresent ring size and decrease in visual function. While
hyperautofluoresent ring size may be negatively associated with FAZ size, it is
not a reliable predictor of visual acuity or retinal capillary perfusion
density.