Microbial prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility in ocular infection at London Health Sciences Center
My Session Status
Author Disclosure Block: R. Gupta: None. G. Sivakumar: None. R. Mather: None.
Abstract Body:
Purpose: To determine the profile of bacterial isolates
from submitted ocular cultures in London, Ontario and evaluate their
susceptibility to common antibiotic agents.
Study Design: A retrospective quality improvement analysis of all
ocular culture specimens was performed using the electronic database hosted by
the London Health Sciences Microbiology Lab in London, Ontario between 1999 to
2017.
Methods: Data was analyzed to determine most common bacterial
specimens in submitted conjunctival, corneal, and vitreous fluid cultures.
Antimicrobial susceptibility data was extracted only between 1999 to 2011 due
to data availability.
Results: A total sample of 3,367 isolates were included from ocular
cultures analyzed in the LHSC electronic database. In these specimens, there
were 2,760 conjunctival, 390 corneal, and 217 vitreous fluid cultures with
bacterial isolates. The leading bacterial pathogens associated with
conjunctivitis in the geographic region of London, ON were Coagulase negative
staphylococcus (CoNS; n=778, 28.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (n=552, 20.0%),
Haemophilus species (n=292, 10.6%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=147, 5.3%).
Conjunctival isolates positive for Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS demonstrated
76% and 100% susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, respectively. CoNS (n=119,
30.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (n=49, 12.6%), Pseudomonas aureus (n=25, 6.4%),
and Streptococcus species (n=29, 7.4%), were among the most prevalent pathogens
associated with keratitis. Isolates from contact lens-wearers in ocular
infections included Gram-negative pathogens such as Enterobacter, Klebsiella,
Serratia, and Pseudomonas species. Gram-positive bacteria were predominant in
endophthalmitis consisting of CoNS (n=88, 40.6%), Streptococcus species (n=15,
6.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (n=10, 4.6%). Gram-positive organisms in
keratitis and endophthalmitis culture specimens demonstrated 100%
susceptibility to vancomycin. Cefazolin showed an antimicrobial efficacy of
86%, while gentamicin showed an efficacy of 90% for gram-negative
endophthalmitis specimens.
Conclusions: Gram-positive cocci appear to be the most common cause
of ocular infections in London, ON. Susceptibility data suggests that most
gram-positive ocular pathogens showed in vitro susceptibility to ciprofloxacin
and vancomycin. Currently, fourth-generation fluoroquinolones are not routinely
tested for susceptibility at our centre. Gram-negative species should be borne
in mind for keratitis, especially in the setting of contact-lens wear.
Gram-positive bacteria are most commonly isolated from vitreous samples.
Intravitreal vancomycin and ceftazidime is the current standard for empiric
regimen in the treatment of endophthalmitis at our centre. While gentamicin
demonstrated excellent efficacy against gram-negative species in the setting of
endophthalmitis, there are concerns for possible retinal toxicity due to a
narrow therapeutic range.