Lawyer (ranked in Chambers for TMT Italy - Information Technology) advising national and international/multi-national clients on complex tecnology-related issues.
Adjunct professor of Algorithm and Data Management Law and Business CyberLaw at LUISS "Guido Carli University".
VicePresident of the Monitoring Body of the Italian Code of Conduct for Telemarketing and Teleselling
Former advisor of the Italian Government has contributed to design and drafting of legislation on Electronic Identity (SPID), and digital transformation (2016 review of the Digital Administrative Code, digital domicile, cross-border electronic identity, etc).
Eugenio holds a Ph.D in Commercial Law (Rome, Tor Vergata University, 2007) and has passed value judgement as Associate Professor of Commercial Law.
He is the author of several publications and articles on legal topics including privacy, artificial intelligence, electronic identity, cloud contracts and digital copyright.
Sessions in which Eugenio Prosperetti participates
Thursday 15 May, 2025
Valutare l’eventuale gap tra le aspettative con cui il Codice di Condotta è nato e la realtà applicativa ad un anno dalla sua approvazione.Fare emergere gli eventuali impatti eccessivamente onerosi a carico delle imprese aderenti o di quelle che vogliono comunque conformarsi al Codice di Condotta.Discutere di eventuali spunti di miglioramento delle regole del Codice e della sua interazione con le altre iniziative di contrasto al telemarketing illegale.
Sessions in which Eugenio Prosperetti attends
Tuesday 13 May, 2025
This panel will discuss emergent technologies that may reduce AI risks and possible regulatory responses to such technology.
When it comes to the relationship between privacy and antitrust, we’re entering a complex zone. On one side, we have the protection of personal data. On the other side, there are market forces where monopolistic practices and anti-competitive behavior can harm consumers and stifle innovation. This session will explore how privacy and antitrust law collide, challenge each other, and sometimes even work together to p...
There is a lack of consensus among governments about what it means to be trusted and how to determine what constitutes a trusted cloud service provider in the context of data protection and cybersecurity. Without a common framework and criteria to assess trustworthiness, there will continue to be a lack of trust in data flows, hindering innovation and growth in today’s data-driven economy. This panel will discuss the development of a criteria-bas...
Wednesday 14 May, 2025
Aiming to balance a safe and competitive digital space with the right of free expression, the interplay of these two Acts forms a critical discussion when considering the place of freedom of expression in the broader topic of privacy and data regulation. Hearing from representatives from the European Commission and legal experts, attendees of this session will gain an insight into the interplay of the Acts and how they currently sit in relation t...
In un contesto in cui gli agenti AI assumono compiti sempre più sofisticati — dalla rappresentanza nelle interazioni digitali fino alla gestione autonoma di dati personali — si aprono interrogativi cruciali: può un agente artificiale rappresentare legalmente una persona? Quali diritti e doveri si innescano nella delega digitale di sé? Come si tutela la privacy in un contesto dove l’identità può essere “replicata” e “agita” da una macchina? Nel dibattito interverranno i rappresentanti dell’Aut...
Age assurance is a growing requirement for online safety, but one that comes with clear interdependencies with data protection. Requirements for highly effective age assurance have to be considered alongside data minimisation requirements under the GDPR. The limitations of working in silos must be overcome, and one way of doing so is via a multistakeholder dialogue that brings data protection regulators, safety regulators, academics, companies an...