Passer au contenu de la page principale

The effect of macular internal limiting membrane peeling on single surgery success rates in individuals undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for uncomplicated, primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Mon statut pour la session

Quoi:
Paper Presentation | Présentation d'article
Quand:
2:45 PM, Samedi 11 Juin 2022 (7 minutes)
Thème:
Rétine

Authors: Rosanna K. Martens, Chao Chen, David Ehmann, Mark Greve, Mark E. Seamone. 
Author Disclosure Block: R.K. Martens: None. C. Chen: None. D. Ehmann: None. M. Greve: None. M.E. Seamone: None.

Purpose: To investigate the anatomic and visual outcomes of individuals undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for uncomplicated, primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with and without macular internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. 

Study Design: Retrospective chart review of 187 patients at a single institution with uncomplicated primary macula-off RRD presenting between Jan 01, 2016 to May 31, 2021 and undergoing PPV with and without macular ILM peeling. 

Methods: A total of 48 patients underwent macular ILM peeling and 139 did not. The primary outcome measured was the rate of recurrent RRD. Secondary outcomes included pre- and post- operative BCVA (logMAR), visual improvement from baseline (logMAR), epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and measurement of central foveal subfield thickness.

Results: No significant difference was found in the risk of recurrent RRD between individuals who underwent macular ILM peeling and those that did not {2.1% (1/48) in the peeled group and 3.6% (5/139) in the non-peeled group, p=1.00}. There was no statistically significant difference in visual improvement from baseline between groups. The visual improvement in the peeled group was 1.08 +/- 0.64 logMAR and in the non-peeled group was 0.97 +/- 0.76 logMAR (p=0.343). The rate of ERM formation was significantly lower in the peeled group. No significant difference was found between central foveal subfield thickness which was 301.7 +/- 40.92 um in the peeled group and 300.66 +/- 34.03 um in the non-peeled group (p=0.877). 

Conclusions: ILM peeling of the macula in primary uncomplicated macula-off RRD does not show a statistical benefit in reducing the risk of recurrent RRD. Interestingly, despite a reduction in post-operative ERM formation, macular ILM peeling did not have a statistical benefit on improvement of BCVA. These results are of great clinical significance as they may guide surgical planning in the management of uncomplicated macula-off retinal detachment.

Rosanna Martens

Conférencier.ère

Mon statut pour la session

Évaluer

Detail de session
Pour chaque session, permet aux participants d'écrire un court texte de feedback qui sera envoyé à l'organisateur. Ce texte n'est pas envoyé aux présentateurs.
Afin de respecter les règles de gestion des données privées, cette option affiche uniquement les profils des personnes qui ont accepté de partager leur profil publiquement.

Les changements ici affecteront toutes les pages de détails des sessions