Passer au contenu de la page principale

Prenatal versus postnatal screening for familial retinoblastoma: comparison of cancer treatment burden

Quoi:
Paper Presentation | Présentation d'article
Quand:
4:40 PM, Samedi 17 Juin 2023 (10 minutes)
Où:
Centre des congrès de Québec - Room 308 A | Salle 308 A
Comment:

Authors: Zhao Xun Feng1, Alp Polat2, Stephanie Kletke2, Ashwin Mallipatna2, Brenda Gallie2. 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, 2Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children.

Author Disclosures: Z. Feng: None. A. Polat: None. S. Kletke: None. A. Mallipatna: None. B. Gallie: None. 


Abstract Body: 

Purpose: Pathogenic RB1 allele inheritance predisposes children (termed H1) to early onset bilateral retinoblastoma. We update follow-up and apply a novel measure of treatment impact to H1 infants previously published (Ophthalmology 2016.123(12):2610-2617) that suggested planned early-term delivery facilitates less invasive therapy and better vision outcomes than spontaneous birth. 

Study Design: Retrospective, observational study. 

Methods: We updated follow-up from medical records of consecutive children with familial retinoblastoma born between 1996 and 2014 treated at SickKids. Cohort I spontaneously delivered neonates were examined within 1 week and confirmed to be H1. Cohort II infants were identified H1 by amniocentesis and scheduled for early-term delivery (36-38 weeks’ gestation). We developed a novel method to semi-quantitate outcome and long-term impact for retinoblastoma eyes. Perceived invasiveness and long-term impact of each therapy was assigned a score: 1, focal retinal therapy (cryotherapy, retinal laser); 3 , ocular chemotherapy (periocular, intravitreal); 7 , chemotherapy infusion (systemic, intra-arterial); 7 , eye conserving surgery (brachytherapy, tylectomy); 10 , response to failed attempted eye salvage (enucleation of first eye, external beam radiotherapy) and 20 , enucleation of the last eye. Total eye impact score is the sum of treatment impact scores required to achieve cure. 

Results: Studied were 42 eyes (21 children) (20 Cohort I and 22 Cohort II. All 42 eyes eventually demonstrated tumor, present at birth in 11/20 (55%) Cohort I vs 4/22 (18%) Cohort II (P=0.01). At first tumor appearance, 10/20 (50%) of Cohort I had stage Group A (cT1a) (small tumors not near fovea or optic nerve) vs 15/22 (68%) Cohort II ( P =0.23). Mean treatment impact score Cohort I was 14 (range, 1-31) vs 9 (range, 1-31) Cohort II ( P = 0.08). Focal retinal therapy alone achieved cure in 4/20 (20%) Cohort I vs 10/22 (45%) Cohort II ( P =0.08). Focal retinal therapy combined with ocular chemotherapy achieved cure in 7/20 (35%) Cohort I vs 12/22 (55%) Cohort II ( P =0.20). Failure of eye salvage occurred in 6/20 (30%) Cohort I vs 2/22 (9%) of Cohort II ( P =0.09). Mean LogMar vision was 1.1 (Snellen 20/250) Cohort I vs 0.1 (Snellen 20/40) Cohort II eyes ( P =0.02). Mean follow-up was Cohort I, 11.6 years and Cohort II, 12.2 years 

Conclusions: Children who inherit their parent’s pathogenic RB1 allele achieved cure with less invasive treatments and better vision if they have pre-natal molecular testing and planned early-term delivery which facilitated retinal evaluation prior to onset of first tumor.

 

X

Présentateur.rice
Detail de session
Pour chaque session, permet aux participants d'écrire un court texte de feedback qui sera envoyé à l'organisateur. Ce texte n'est pas envoyé aux présentateurs.
Afin de respecter les règles de gestion des données privées, cette option affiche uniquement les profils des personnes qui ont accepté de partager leur profil publiquement.

Les changements ici affecteront toutes les pages de détails des sessions