Skip to main page content

Comparison of biometric parameters between a Scheimpflug‐based partial coherence interferometer and swept‐source OCT biometer in a Canadian population

What:
Paper Presentation | Présentation d'article
When:
11:48 AM, Friday 16 Jun 2023 (3 minutes)
Where:
Québec City Convention Centre - Room 306 AB | Salle 306 AB
How:

Authors: Andrew C. W. Robart1, Davin Johnson2, Erin Dohaney2. 1Memorial University, 2Queen's University.

Author Disclosures:  A.C.W. Robart:  None.  D. Johnson:  None.  E. Dohaney:  None.

 

Abstract Body: 

Purpose: To compare biometric parameters between the Pentacam AXL and IOL master 700 in a Canadian population of patients undergoing cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange. 

Study Design: Quantitative retrospective cohort study. 

Methods: This retrospective review was conducted by analyzing all patients receiving either cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange at a private surgical centre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada over a 9‐month period between July 2021 and March 2022. We compared axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white‐towhite (WTW), and keratometry measurements between the Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700. Deidentified data collection was automated using optical character recognition (OCR) in Powerapps AI, which sorted data into Excel. All statistical analyses including paired two‐way t‐tests and vector algebra were completed using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). 

Results: The study population consisted of a total of 655 eyes from 328 patients with a mean age of 61 years (range 29 ‐ 85 years). IOL master 700 measurements were completed for all patients, whereas in 3.7% of eyes the Pentacam AXL acquisition was unsuccessful due to the density of the cataract. Statistically significant differences were seen between the two devices with respect to WTW (12.1 vs 11.8 mm, p<0.0001), ACD (3.27 vs 3.30 mm, p <0.0001), and mean keratometric astigmatism (0.9 vs 1.1 D, p = 0.025). No statistically significant differences were seen between the 2 devices with respect to AL (24.17 vs. 24.01 mm, p = 0.054) or mean keratometric power (43.44 vs. 43.40 D, p = 0.30), however, the difference in AL is potentially clinically significant. 

Conclusions: The IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL are not interchangeable devices for pre‐operative measurements. Of great clinical significance is a mean difference of 0.3mm in WTW between the 2 devices. This has important implications for both refractive lens exchange/cataract surgery as well as other refractive procedures including phakic IOL placement.


 

Session detail
Allows attendees to send short textual feedback to the organizer for a session. This is only sent to the organizer and not the speakers.
To respect data privacy rules, this option only displays profiles of attendees who have chosen to share their profile information publicly.

Changes here will affect all session detail pages